Feasibility of pulse rate variability as feedback in closed-loop percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

Percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (pVNS) is a novel approach of treating cardiovascular and inflammatory diseases, as well as pain and neurological conditions. The treatment can be optimized by using biosignals as objective measures and feedback-control. One suitable biofeedback could be the use of pulse rate and pulse rate variability (PRV) derived from optical pulse plethysmography (PPG) instead of heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) derived from electrocardiogram (ECG). For this purpose, a single-lead ECG on the thorax and a PPG on the earlobe were measured simultaneously on 10 healthy subjects for 420 s during three different respiratory phases. The data was analyzed and compared with scatterplots, the Pearson correlation coefficient and a Bland-Altman analysis. The outcomes show a very high correlation of heart rates from PPG and ECG (ri= 0.9663) and SDNN values (rsdnn= 0.9791). Comparison of RMSSD values showed a high positive correlation (rrmssd= 0.7963) but a mean overestimation of 10 ms in RMSSD values measured with the PPG. The results presented suggest that PRV could be and alternative biofeedback used in pVNS

Stimulation pattern efficiency in percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation : experimental versus numerical data

Objective: Percutaneous electrical stimulation of the auricular vagus nerve (pVNS) is an electroceutical technology. The selection of stimulation patterns is empirical, which may lead to under-stimulation or over-stimulation. The objective is to assess the efficiency of different stimulation patterns with respect to individual perception and to compare it with numerical data based on in-silico ear models. Methods: Monophasic (MS), biphasic (BS) and triphasic stimulation (TS) patterns were tested in volunteers. Different clinically-relevant perception levels were assessed. In-silico models of the human ear were created with embedded fibers and vessels to assess different excitation levels. Results: TS indicates experimental superiority over BS which is superior to MS while reaching different perception levels. TS requires about 57% and 35% of BS and MS magnitude, respectively, to reach the comfortable perception. Experimental thresholds decrease from non-bursted to bursted stimulation. Numerical results indicate a slight superiority of BS and TS over MS while reaching different excitation levels, whereas the burst length has no influence. TS yields the highest number of asynchronous action impulses per stimulation symbol for the used tripolar electrode set-up. Conclusion: The comparison of experimental and numerical data favors the novel TS pattern. The analysis separates excitatory pVNS effects in the auricular periphery, as accounted by in-silico data, from the combination of peripheral and central pVNS effects in the brain, as accounted by experimental data. Significance: The proposed approach moves from an empirical selection of stimulation patterns towards efficient and optimized pVNS settings

Current Directions in the Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation I – A Physiological Perspective

Electrical stimulation of the auricular vagus nerve (aVNS) is an emerging technology in the field of bioelectronic medicine with applications in therapy. Modulation of the afferent vagus nerve affects a large number of physiological processes and bodily states associated with information transfer between the brain and body. These include disease mitigating effects and sustainable therapeutic applications ranging from chronic pain diseases, neurodegenerative and metabolic ailments to inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases. Given the current evidence from experimental research in animal and clinical studies we discuss basic aVNS mechanisms and their potential clinical effects. Collectively, we provide a focused review on the physiological role of the vagus nerve and formulate a biology-driven rationale for aVNS. For the first time, two international workshops on aVNS have been held in Warsaw and Vienna in 2017 within the framework of EU COST Action “European network for innovative uses of EMFs in biomedical applications (BM1309).” Both workshops focused critically on the driving physiological mechanisms of aVNS, its experimental and clinical studies in animals and humans, in silico aVNS studies, technological advancements, and regulatory barriers. The results of the workshops are covered in two reviews, covering physiological and engineering aspects. The present review summarizes on physiological aspects – a discussion of engineering aspects is provided by our accompanying article (Kaniusas et al., 2019). Both reviews build a reasonable bridge from the rationale of aVNS as a therapeutic tool to current research lines, all of them being highly relevant for the promising aVNS technology to reach the patient

Current Directions in the Auricular

Electrical stimulation of the auricular vagus nerve (aVNS) is an emerging electroceutical technology in the field of bioelectronic medicine with applications in therapy. Artificial modulation of the afferent vagus nerve – a powerful entrance to the brain – affects a large number of physiological processes implicating interactions between the brain and body. Engineering aspects of aVNS determine its efficiency in application. The relevant safety and regulatory issues need to be appropriately addressed. In particular, in silico modeling acts as a tool for aVNS optimization. The evolution of personalized electroceuticals using novel architectures of the closed-loop aVNS paradigms with biofeedback can be expected to optimally meet therapy needs. For the first time, two international workshops on aVNS have been held in Warsaw and Vienna in 2017 within the scope of EU COST Action “European network for innovative uses of EMFs in biomedical applications (BM1309).” Both workshops focused critically on the driving physiological mechanisms of aVNS, its experimental and clinical studies in animals and humans, in silico aVNS studies, technological advancements, and regulatory barriers. The results of the workshops are covered in two reviews, covering physiological and engineering aspects. The present review summarizes on engineering aspects – a discussion of physiological aspects is provided by our accompanying article (Kaniusas et al., 2019). Both reviews build a reasonable bridge from the rationale of aVNS as a therapeutic tool to current research lines, all of them being highly relevant for the promising aVNS technology to reach the patient.European Cooperation in Science and TechnologyThe Austrian Research Promotion Agenc